I really would like to hear a reasonable answer to Rosemary's question: Why would Clinton-era tax rates on people with annual incomes in excess of $200,000 solve all the problems of the day, when that money apparently wasn't sufficient back in the 90s? In fact, tax rates are lower on everyone else, so wouldn't that mean we'd still be short some money?
And we all know that all it takes for government to solve any problem is money. Lots of it.
Right?
