I'm watching Hannity & Colmes, and guest liberal Susan Estrich states that, if Richard Clarke hadn't played such a key counter-terrorism role in the Clinton Administration, the plot to set off a bomb at Los Angeles International Airport in December 1999 wouldn't have been foiled.
But as we've known for years, Customs agents stopped Ahmed Ressam because they suspected he was smuggling drugs.
(Inspector Mark) Johnson took a sample of the white powder from the trunk to test. Was it heroin, speed, cocaine? Negative on each. As he shook the jars of brown liquid, Noris (Ressam's alias), who could see Johnson from the patrol car, ducked down to the floor.
Within a couple of days, the inspectors would learn that the brown liquid Johnson had shaken was a powerful, highly unstable relative of nitroglycerin that could have blown them all to bits.
Why do these people continue to propagate lies? Lies which are easily exposed? Can they be both stupid and liars?
