My thoughts on whatever happens to wander through my mind
 
 
 
Local links
 
Other links
 
 
 
Texas blogs
 
 
 
Blogroll - Blogroll Me!
 
 
Friday, April 30, 2004
 
One = Seven

I was amused by the news segment on Channel 4 about Michael Jackson's indictment on multiple charges today. Unfortunately, they don't have anything on the web about it yet, but I found the quote I was looking for at Voice of America:
"This case is not about lawyers or anyone else becoming celebrities," [Jackson's lawyer, Thomas Mesereau] said. "This defense is going to be conducted with professionalism and dignity at all times. This case is about one thing only. It's about the dignity[1], the integrity[2], the decency[3], the honor[4], the charity[5], the innocence[6], and the complete vindication[7] of a wonderful human being named Michael Jackson."
Is it any wonder the US entertainment industry is based in California?

 
Vietnam appreciates John Kerry's service

His anti-war service, that is. Shamelessly stolen from that Communist demagogue, The Commissar:
HANOI (Reuters) - Twenty-nine years after the end of the Vietnam war, communist military mastermind General Vo Nguyen Giap remains grateful to the Americans who opposed it. The Vietnam War, known in Vietnam as the American War, has become a hot issue in the U.S. presidential race with Democrat John Kerry drawing attention to his service and President Bush's Republicans disparaging Kerry's later anti-war stand. "I would like to thank them," the 93-year-old veteran said on Friday of those Americans who opposed the war.
But he sounded a note of warning. "Any forces that wish to impose their will on other nations will surely fail," he said. "Each nation should have the right to independence," he said, wagging a finger at reporters and Foreign Ministry staff in an ornate French colonial style government guest house in the capital, Hanoi.
I guess this reveals the identity of one of John Kerry's foreign advocates.

 
Have you had your waffle today?

My, my, my. I see that John Kerry has fallen way down on the waffle scale at Google. Even worse, in an apparent countermove by the left, President Bush's site is about 8th on the list. Let's be sure and call a waffle a waffle. Inspired by David Andersen's Stinky Politician post at Insults Unpunished.

 
Is he in it to win?

According to an article in the Washington Times, John Kerry's campaign hasn't shown up in several pivotal states so far.
The Democratic presidential candidate's campaign has been almost invisible not only in pivotal states, such as Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio, but also in the South, a region that some party strategists fear he will "write off" to focus his resources elsewhere in the country, according to Democratic officials.
On the other hand, some folks think that President Bush may be peaking too early.
"I spoke at a Lincoln Day dinner in the northwest corner of Michigan Saturday night, where there was a Bush operative who said he was one of nine in Michigan. I was stunned. I'm wondering if the Bush people are too geared up and should save their resources for a better time," said Michigan election analyst Bill Ballenger.
I suppose that, despite the fact that Kerry has had the Democratic nomination sewed up for almost two months, it takes time to get things organized. But the bottom line is, no matter what opinion you want to hold, you'll be able to find "experts" somewhere who agree with you.


Thursday, April 29, 2004
 
I'm glad I don't live in Alexandria

The superintendent of Schools in Alexandria, VA, was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol last Friday. The Alexandria School Board has met four times (four times!) since then to consider the superintendent's fate. In the meantime, she has apologized repeatedly for her "lapse in judgment," and asked for forgiveness. The Alexandria School Board, in their infinite wisdom, has decided to stand behind her and retain her as Superintendent. If I lived in Alexandria, how would I explain this to my kids?

 
What's the deal?

Everywhere I turn, people agree with me. Okay, not on everything, but on the most important issue of the day. Terrorism must be defeated. And the primary battleground against terrorism is in Iraq right now. President Bush, while far from perfect, is the man for the job. I just don't understand. The people who live around me agree. The people who belong to civic and governmental organizations I participate in agree. The people I work with (who live over a pretty widespread area) agree with me. So where is the other half of the population of the US who disagree? I just don't understand.


Tuesday, April 27, 2004
 
My favorite

There's a reason James Joyner of Outside the Beltway is at the top of my RSS reader. Go read him and find out why. And for those who have been wondering when I'll post again (both of you) and/or why I haven't posted much lately, it's a combination of Real Life™ and trying to keep up on reading blogs. There are so many compelling blogs that help me understand what's going on. James's just happens to be the best of them. Update: And it has nothing to do with my Scotch consumption this evening.


Sunday, April 25, 2004
 
The queen has a new hive

Rosemary Esmay has opened her new blog, The Queen of All Evil. Judging from her posts on her husband's site, the new blog should be a real winner.


Friday, April 23, 2004
 


It's probably not news to you, but Syria is supplying men and materiel to the insurgents in Iraq (Iran is doing this, as well). To get away from the strategic approach to this for a bit, for the purposes of this discussion let's not worry about how involved the Syrian and Iranian governments are. Let's focus on the tactical aim of sealing, as best we can, Iraq's porous borders. What's happening to stop the influx across the Iraqi borders? While the linked article briefly mentions that the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force has intensified their focus on the Syrian border, and has even sent reconnaissance patrols into Syria itself to "find, fix and ultimately finish a number of cells that were out there, that were facilitating this type movement," we don't hear much about this kind of activity. We hear about Najaf, Fallujah, Baghdad, et al, but not much about what's happening in the hinterlands. While we have to continue to eliminate (euphamism for "kill) the insurgents, if we're not stopping their resupply, we won't make much progress. I don't think for a minute that the Army and Marines are not doing this, I'm just wondering why we don't hear more about it, why it's not more prominent in the news reports. To me, it's on an equal level of importance, and therefore interest, with the fighting in and around the cities.

 
Googling can be so much fun

Kevin at Wizbang tells us that Googling "waffles" and clicking on the "I feel lucky" button brings up an appropriate site. I don't know how much difference links make on the "I feel lucky" approach, but just in case it helps, waffles.


Thursday, April 22, 2004
 
Finishing the job

You may recall my earlier post on Google search results on the term "Jew," and how bloggers have seemed to turn the tide so that searches yield a more appropriate "first hit." Robert Prather proposes a logical extension of our earlier effort: getting the appropriate results for a search on peckerwood.

 
Happy Earth Day!

Thirty-four years ago today, I wore a homemade green armband on my left sleeve when I went to school in recognition of the first Earth Day. That lasted until I got to Mrs. Wright's class, and she wasn't having it. The armband came off, and I suppose that was the beginning of the end of my liberal-ish leanings. In truth, I was interested in Earth Day and wore the armband because my best friend at the time, John, was pretty liberal and stayed up on these kinds of things. Probably still does to this day, but I haven't seen him in over thirty years now. And yet, while I don't intend to wear a green armband or anything like that, my conservative leanings don't make me an "anti-environmentalist," as some might claim. I believe in preserving our environment; I disagree with the so-called "environmentalists" over some of the methods we should use. There are many others we agree on. I don't throw trash out my truck window. I pick up other's trash when I walk past it. When I go hunting, I come back with everything I took in (and hopefully come out with a little extra something that will end up in the freezer). I'm glad we've worked so hard over the decades to reduce harmful emissions from most vehicles. I believe we should do more to reduce those emissions from diesel-powered vehicles. I support research to find alternative, renewable energy sources. I ride a bike. I walk to pick up the kids from school (which really irritates both the kids and my wife). There's more, but you get the idea. So, in recognition of Earth Day, I'm going to go out and hug a tree and tell it how important it is to me.


Wednesday, April 21, 2004
 
She's no Ian Anderson - yet

Not that she even aspires to become an Ian Anderson, but my 12-year-old daughter, Megan, participated this past Saturday in her first Solo/Ensemble Festival since she began playing the flute last summer. She achieved a "I - Superior," on a scale of I to IV. I'm so proud of my girl! (as I am of all five of my children, of course)


Tuesday, April 20, 2004
 
A message to dondo

Don and I started a bit of a debate last week over at OTB "regarding the no-win situation the Bush administration finds itself in with its opponents regarding the 9/11 attacks and the war on terrorism. We brought it over here, and I still haven't responded to Don's latest volley. I must hereby publicly and officially apologize to Don for letting this one drag. I took too long to get back to the subject and got distracted by other subjects and activities. Don, despite the fact that he's a wacko liberal (just kidding, he's not wacko), is a fair guy. We disagree, but we can debate subjects honestly. He deserves better than that.

 
Cherry picking

Some of our more liberal friends appear to want to pick and choose when Bob Woodward is giving us the "real deal," and when he's, well, inaccurate. In a mild example of this (extremists, be they conservative or liberal, drive me up a wall, so I limit myself to the more "moderate" liberal blogs), Kevin Drum appears to disbelieve Woodward's recitation of preparations for making the case for WMD to the American public. After a CIA briefing on their evidence of WMD, the President was underwhelmed, and told CIA Director Tenet and his staff to go back and make a stronger case. His final admonition, and Kevin's reaction:
The president told Tenet several times, "Make sure no one stretches to make our case."
Right. No stretching. That sounds like the Bush we know, doesn't it?
I get the impression that Kevin felt his snark fell short of the needed emphasis, so he had to add another one which comes off more as a whine:
Of course, considering that this presentation was made in late December 2002, it was a little late for that warning, wasn't it?
Contrast that with Kevin's initial post on Woodward's book (actually, the 60 Minutes coverage of the book), where his acceptance of Woodward's assertion that the Saudi's have agreed to drop oil prices to help the President's reelection campaign is automatic and unquestioning.
...it's April already and they haven't done it yet. What are they waiting for? Or were they just yanking Bush's chain all along?
Kevin apparently didn't even consider the possibility that Woodward could have been wrong, just that the Saudis hadn't fulfilled their promise.

 
Did I tell you my son is a Marine?

My eldest son enlisted in the Marine Corps a couple of years ago. He's in a field that requires a lot of training, so he hasn't made it out to the fleet yet. Even though there was always the interservice rivalry with the Marines through my Naval career, no two American uniformed services are closer or have greater mutual respect. My respect for the Marines has only heightened since my son joined them, and I've gotten to know them even better than I did before. With that, Smash posts a letter from the Battalion Commander and Command Sergeant Major of the Second Battalion, Fourth Marines, to the battalion's spouses back home. I hate to copy others, but it's so inspiring, I had to follow suit. The letter:
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 2:03 AM Subject: Update from LtCol Kennedy Dear Ladies, the last two days have been the hardest two days this battalion has faced in over 30 years. Within the blink of an eye the situation went form relatively calm to a raging storm. You've known that since arriving there has been violence; attacks have been sporadic and mostly limited to roadside bombs. Your husbands have become experts at recognizing those threats and neutralizing them before we are injured. Up to this point the war has been the purview of corporals and sergeants, and the squad they lead. Yesterday the enemy upped the ante. Early in the morning we exchanged gunfire with a group of insurgents without significant loss. As morning progressed, the enemy fed more men into the fight and we responded with stronger force. Unfortunately, this led to injuries as our Marines and sailors started clearing the city block by block. The enemy did not run; they fought us like soldiers. And we destroyed the enemy like only Marines can. By the end of the evening the local hospital was so full of their dead and wounded that they ran out of space to put them. Your husbands were awesome all night they stayed at the job of securing the streets and nobody challenged them as the hours wore on. They did not surrender an inch nor did flinch from the next potential threat. Previous to yesterday the terrorist thought that we were soft enough to challenge. As of tonight the message is loud and clear that the Marines will not be beaten. Today the enemy started all over again, although with far fewer numbers, only now the rest of the battalion joined the fight. Without elaborating too much, weapons company and Golf crushed their attackers with the vengeance of the righteous. They filled up the hospitals again and we suffered only a few injuries. Echo company dominated the previous day's battlefield. Fox company patrolled with confidence and authority; nobody challenged them. Even Headquarters Company manned their stations and counted far fewer people openly watching us with disdain. If the enemy is foolish enough to try to take your men again they will not survive contact. We are here to win. The news looks grim from back in the States. We did take losses that, in our hearts, we will always live with. The men we lost were taken within the very opening minutes of the violence. They could not have foreseen the treachery of the enemy and they did not suffer. We can never replace these Marines and Sailors but they will fight on with us in spirit. We are not feeling sorry for ourselves nor do we fear what tomorrow will bring. The battalion has lived up to its reputation as Magnificent Bastards. Yesterday made everyone here stronger and wiser; it will be a cold day in Hell before we are taken for granted again. Paul Kennedy and Jim Booker
As Smash says, "Semper Fi." UPDATE: Smash has more, but it contains elided salty military expletives. If you're sensitive to such things, you should probably give it a pass.


Monday, April 19, 2004
 
Feeling lazy

Maybe it's the heat. Maybe it's spring fever. Maybe I'm just lazy. But I can't work up the mental inspiration to post lately. Maybe it was all that money I had to pay the IRS last week. That always makes me depressed.


Sunday, April 18, 2004
 
Blogging: Arrgh!

I've gotta get the process for blogging down a little better. I keep finding where I've intended to link to something, but not wanting to break my flow of thoughts while writing, I'll insert the HTML syntax for the link with the intention of returning later to add the actual link to the "href" tag. I just found one of my posts from Friday where I forgot to come back and put in the link. Grr. While it's corrected now, anybody who read the post before about ten minutes ago got a broken link. I've gotta figure out a better process to avoid this.

 
Another example of liberal bias in the press

Michael Getler, The Washington Post's Ombudsman, writes today about The Post's coverage in last Sunday's paper of the August 6, 2001, Presidential Daily Brief.
The lead of the story by reporters Dana Milbank and Walter Pincus said: "President Bush was warned a month before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that the FBI had information that terrorists might be preparing for a hijacking in the United States and might be targeting a building in Lower Manhattan." The story said the information was in the written daily briefing presented to Bush on Aug. 6, 2001.
Over the past several years, I've come to the opinion that the editorial pages of The Post are not nearly so liberal, or anti-conservative, as the news pages, a condition which is, of course, much more insidious, and much more dangerous. The problem Getler discusses is, to me, a clear symptom of this problem and clear evidence in support of the term "liberal media." Fortunately, The Post has long had an Ombudsman on their staff (unlike another large, influential newspaper on the East Coast which shall remain nameless), so many folks contacted Getler over this irresponsible injection of Milbank's and Pincus's personal political agendas into the story.
The memo refers to "federal buildings" and not "a building," as the story's first sentence does. The memo does not use the word "targeting." It mentions "New York" but does not specify "Lower Manhattan." ... The words "targeting a building in Lower Manhattan" present a mental picture closer to the World Trade Center than does "federal buildings in New York," which could mean many locations.
Getler goes on to cite other instances of political spin in the story, including its positioning alongside a related article and a photo from August 2001 of the President in a golf cart. One reader responded,
"Message conveyed," wrote one reader. "Fully aware of Osama bin Laden's plans to hijack an airliner and crash it into a building in lower Manhattan, Bush has fun on the golf course."
Getler concludes,
...it seems to me that these complaints, even if some of them reflect political views, are valid criticisms and worth learning from.
He falls on the correct end of the scale, but fails miserably in terms of degree. The so-called "reporters" clearly structured the article to put the administration in the worst possible light. If they truly believe what they're trying to get their readers to believe, that the PDB was a clear indication of contemporary activity by bin Laden to fly hijacked airliners into buildings in New York, that the PDB provided "actionable intelligence," implying that the President should have taken action, but instead he was spending his time on a golf course, then they're idiots, and should be summarily fired. A reporter who can't objectively parse such a relatively short, straight-forward document as that PDB isn't sufficiently competent. On the other hand, if they didn't actually believe what they "implied," then they're liars. I would hope that neither incompetents nor liars are welcome on The Post's staff. One more instance of some folks being either stupid or liars. UPDATE: Spoons points to a post by Dave Huber on this topic. I sent a trackback to Spoons, but then forgot (until now) to update this post to legitimize the trackback.


Saturday, April 17, 2004
 
Beautiful day

The weather was waaay too nice today to spend any time at the computer. Also, my 7-year-old son has a new-found interest in baseball, so we spent a significant portion of the day tossing the ball back and forth, along with some batting practice. To my unpracticed and prejudiced eye, he looks pretty good for his first day. Add to that the fact that my brain demanded a break from the routine, and I haven't been around much. My brain still wants a little breathing room, so unless something clicks tonight, it'll probably be tomorrow before I'm back. The worst thing is that I'm getting behind in my blog reading, too. That's always a pain to catch up on.


Friday, April 16, 2004
 
Cicada: The Other, Other White Meat

The Washington Post has a marvelous article related to the impending eruption of cicadas in the D.C. area which reminds us that we don't have to let the bugs annoy us.
Jacques Tiziou, a Frenchman-turned-American who lives in a tree-fringed colonial in Northwest, will gather as many as he can, eating a few right away and saving the rest for later. Silver-bearded and gentle of disposition, he speaks in accented English that makes even bugs sound irresistible. "You're going to grab one and put it in your mouth alive," he says with a twinkle in his eye. "You have to."
Somehow, I doubt it, Jacques. But some folks are truly dedicated to the consumption of cicadas.
...David George Gordon, a science writer in Port Townsend, Wash., and the author of "The Eat-A-Bug Cookbook," ...[believes] the cicadas about to emerge in the eastern United States should be considered a delicacy. "They have a nutty flavor," he says, "almost like a pistachio nut." Gordon's cookbook offers a recipe for cicada-topped pizza. As an accompaniment, he suggests a crisp chardonnay or a semillon blanc. He also recommends you begin drinking as you cook, "to fortify yourself."
No doubt. Okay, let's say you've won me over, and I'm gonna catch me some of these bugs and cook 'em up. How do I go about this?
Experienced cicada-eaters advise would-be entomophages to be alert for the mass emergence that will begin one May evening, when nymphs -- as many as 1.5 million per acre -- will crawl out of the soil and head for a vertical surface, usually a tree. There they will molt, taking about an hour to squeeze out of their dust-colored skins. Once they have broken free, it is your moment to strike: Pluck the creamy white adults off the trees. Gather as many as you desire for the culinary adventures ahead. Admire their red eyes and furled wings. Do hurry. The exoskeletons of the newly molted adults will turn black within about 12 hours and harden over the next couple days. Once that happens, the cicadas remain eminently edible but they lose their soft-shell cachet. They're also easier to apprehend in their just-molted stage. If you don't want to eat your cicadas right off the tree, cookbook author Gordon recommends placing your bounty in the freezer. "It's a dignified death; they drift off into a deep sleep and never feel any pain," he says.
I'll bet PETA disapproves. Thanks to my colleague Dave, who alerted me to this article.


Thursday, April 15, 2004
 
NOW you're in trouble!

Okay, only one of you chuckleheads wonderful people has bothered to click on the link to the photo of Darby, my troublesome puppy. So as they say, if you can't bring Mohammed to the mountain, bring the mountain to Mohammed.
Darby on St. Patrick's Day


Wednesday, April 14, 2004
 
Blogging delay

I had scratched out a few notes for some evening blogging, but that plan got trashed. Our six-month-old cockapoo puppy, Darby, was spayed yesterday, and this evening she developed what appeared to be some severe discomfort. Once I got home about 5 p.m., she got up from where she was lying on the couch to greet me at the door, and for the next four hours, she remained standing. On occasion, she would go running across the room, then screech to a stop and try to scratch her stomach (which she couldn't reach, fortunately). Other times, she would just stand in one spot for five or ten minutes. This is far from normal behavior for her. After failing to reach her veterinarian, we took her to the emergency vet. We waited for about an hour (they triage their patients, and we were certainly on the bottom of the list, which included seizures, bleeding from the mouth, and other severe problems) until we finally got to see the vet. She ended up giving Darby a narcotic injection, and now Darby's finally asleep in her cage (where she sleeps every night — she's too mischievous to allow her to roam while we sleep). At any rate, this evolution has blown my entire evening, so hopefully I'll catch up with my blogging tomorrow.

 
Liberals advocate murder, impersonate President

As Paul pointed out at Wizbang yesterday, the St. Petersburg Democratic Club took out an ad in a Gulfport, Fla., weekly, advocating putting Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld "up against the wall and say 'This is one of our bad days,' and pull the trigger." Adding to the lunatic fringe of the left, MoveOn.org has a new television commercial which imitates President Bush's voice, saying, "Before 9/11, I was obsessed with Iraq. Then I used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq, so now we're less safe than we were before." While the commercial does show a disclaimer that the voice is being imitated, it's in white letters against a bright background, making it difficult to see. Despite their disingenuous protestations, this ad will certainly fool many people. Which, of course, is their intent.


Tuesday, April 13, 2004
 
Stupidity or a lie?

I'm watching Hannity & Colmes, and guest liberal Susan Estrich states that, if Richard Clarke hadn't played such a key counter-terrorism role in the Clinton Administration, the plot to set off a bomb at Los Angeles International Airport in December 1999 wouldn't have been foiled. But as we've known for years, Customs agents stopped Ahmed Ressam because they suspected he was smuggling drugs.
(Inspector Mark) Johnson took a sample of the white powder from the trunk to test. Was it heroin, speed, cocaine? Negative on each. As he shook the jars of brown liquid, Noris (Ressam's alias), who could see Johnson from the patrol car, ducked down to the floor. Within a couple of days, the inspectors would learn that the brown liquid Johnson had shaken was a powerful, highly unstable relative of nitroglycerin that could have blown them all to bits.
Why do these people continue to propagate lies? Lies which are easily exposed? Can they be both stupid and liars?

 
Is it really that hard to say, "I'm sorry, I made a mistake"?

Kevin Drum comments on Janet Reno's testimony before the 9/11 Commission, wherein she reportedly states, "I never focused on al Qaeda, because I stood there and watched the Murrah Building (in Oklahoma City) in rubble." Kevin continues,
I'm not sure what the context of that statement was, but it seems like a reasonably frank admission of an obvious truth. It's too late now, of course, but I still think Bush and Rice would have been better off saying something along these lines all along.
This is one of those times when we agree. One of my complaints about the Bush administration is that they're so political; so many things are seen through that particular prism. And then, so many other times, in the really big things, the administration strikes me as one of the most apolitical presidencies I've ever seen. "Do what's right, because it's right, and don't worry about the political consequences." I suppose it's because President Bush takes that stance on the really big things that I tend to give him a pass when he plays games on the little ones. It would be so simple, and to my politically naïve mind, so much better, if they would just stand up, head bowed in contrition, and say, "We made a mistake, and we're sorry."


Monday, April 12, 2004
 
How much blame can we assign to Bush?

I engaged dondo in a comments discussion over James Joyner's post at Outside the Beltway regarding the the no-win situation the Bush administration finds itself in with its opponents regarding the 9/11 attacks and the war on terrorism. We essentially left off with, in dondo's words, "I don't think the key point of the PDB is that anybody 'could have prevented 9/11' -- that's just politics." dondo's next point was,
My central criticism around all this is not that 9/11 happened, but that "terrorism" wasn't a particular priority for Bush before it, that afterwards he wrapped himself in it, and that his policies are long term disasters.
Only in retrospect, from our vantage point two and a half years later, can we truly find fault with the Bush administration's level of emphasis on terrorism. Despite Richard Clarke's self-serving comparison of the Clinton and Bush administrations, it seems to me there was no significant difference between the two on this point. And looking at terrorism through an early 2001 prism instead of a 2004 prism, I don't really have a problem with their levels of emphasis. I don't think you can lay any more blame at the feet of the Bush administration on their approach and emphasis to international terrorism, both state sponsored and non-state sponsored, than you can with the Clinton administration. Those of us outside the intelligence community don't have the knowledge to evaluate if there was enough useful information to justify more aggressive action before the 9/11 attacks, but to all appearances, there wasn't an appreciable increase in useful intelligence for the Bush administration than what was available to the Clinton administration. The PDB certainly doesn't provide much in the way of recent information. While the losses we suffered on 9/11 are truly regrettable, I just don't think it's reasonable to blame a President for failing to prevent them. No one had reason to expect that Islamic terrorists were considering hijacking airliners and flying them into buildings. I'll pause here to express my contempt for newscasters who try to turn the August 6, 2001 PDB into an indictment of the Bush administration. I watched Alan Colmes do it tonight, and I'll state flat-out right here, he's being intellectually dishonest with that position. For Texans, I'm calling him a liar. Alan's a smart man, and he knows better than that. He's starting from a position and stacks the bits and pieces to support that position, rather than letting the facts fall where they may so that he can discern the truth, or acknowledging the inability to discern the truth based on limited information. Yes, I'm calling Alan Colmes a liar. And merely to be fair and balanced, I'll state here that Sean Hannity is frequently intellectually dishonest, despite his many protestations. Yes, Sean, you're a liar, too. And if you're not a liar, you're unbelievably stupid. I've covered a lot of stuff here, so I'll pause for responses, if any. Next up: dondo says that Bush's post-9/11 policies are long term disasters. We disagree, and neither of us will convince the other to switch sides, but it should be an interesting discussion. P.S. Is Susan Estrich really a liberal? I'm watching her on Greta van Susteren's On The Record, and like every other time I've seen her on Fox, she's the most conservative nominal liberal I've ever heard. I'd love to discuss these subjects with her — not that I don't enjoy discussing them with you, too, dondo. :-)

 
A racist in every pot

Are people laughing at William Hung? Definitely. Is it because those people are racist against Asian Americans? As John Stossel would say, give me a break! Via Spot On.

 
Another nightmare for PETA

From the Washington Times:
The Lone Star State is grappling with the nation's largest population of feral pigs -- squealing, rooting hordes of hogs that can destroy farmland and wildlife habitats, sully public parks, attack pets and domestic animals, and spread diseases such as tuberculosis and even anthrax to farm animals.
These razorbacks have been around for a while. Their lineage extends back to pigs introduced into the New World by de Soto in the 16th century and Russian wild boars that arrived in America in the 1800s. So, what's the big deal with these feral hogs?
The pigs are running amok, particularly in Texas, where the population has "skyrocketed" in the past decade, said Billy Higginbotham, a fish and wildlife specialist with Texas A&M University. He tracks the pigs the best he can. "We don't really know how many there are," he says, adding that no resident had anything "good to say about feral hogs." Mr. Higginbotham also tracks pig damage, which averages $4,184 per incident among farmers or landowners vexed by errant pigs wallowing in ponds, digging up fences, stealing feed or attacking pets. They are not petite pigs: Feral versions can weigh up to 450 pounds. "I fear allowing my grandchildren to go beyond the yard as they may be attacked by wild hogs," one landowner wrote in a response to Mr. Higginbotham's ongoing survey of residents with serious wild pig issues in 40 Texas counties. ... Some tolerate wild hogs just fine -- mainly local hunters, sportsmen or game guides who prefer to negotiate with the pigs through a shotgun or bow and arrow. Sharpshooters have the blessings of many local authorities who are hard-pressed to control the mostly nocturnal pigs. In Texas, feral-hog hunting requires a license and there is no bag limit.
Now we get to the best part:
None of this goes over well with Virginia-based People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, (PETA) which has protested feral-pig hunting or public "hot dog" hunts -- which pit a pig against a dog -- for years, calling the practices "outrageous" and blaming the problem on "human irresponsibility."
Makes me want to look into getting a license next time I go home to visit.


Sunday, April 11, 2004
 
Easter meal

Others prepared various dishes which were delicious, but my job was the main course: the lamb. There were to be 15 of us, so I had bought two boneless legs of lamb. I spent about an hour cutting up fresh garlic and inserting it into the legs. When I had cut up the garlic, but before I inserted it into the lamb, I was afraid I didn't have as much garlic as I wanted. Once I started struggling to find new places to put the garlic, my fears were eased. About two hours or so before dinner time, I fired up the Webber charcoal grill (the finest cooking device known to mankind). I dusted the lamb with rosemary and thyme, and when the coals were just right, I put the lamb on the grill. Before I put the lid on, I added chunks of hickory and mesquite wood on the fire, which was separated into two piles, so the lamb would cook by indirect heat. All I have to say is that I'm satisfied with the results of my labor. Oh, and every time I burp this evening, I'm reminded that I had plenty of garlic.

 
Iraq and Islamic terrorism

James Joyner relates a Washington Post story on the discovery of remnants of suicide squads in Fallujah, Iraq. The most important point to me was
The evidence -- Islamic books, pamphlets, tapes and farewell letters in Arabic -- suggested that some of the men were not Iraqis from the area, but foreign Sunni Muslims who had traveled to this urban Sunni stronghold to fight and die in a holy war, both against the U.S. forces and the country's Shiite Muslim majority.
To be honest, though,
...so far they have not conclusively established that any of the insurgents were foreign infiltrators.
Not conclusively,
But the unearthing of the Islamic documents among the bomb-making materials Sunday, while two foreign journalists and an Arabic interpreter were present, suggested that at least some of the suicide squad members were not from Iraq.
I don't know how closely Iraq was linked to Islamic terrorism before we attacked last year. I agree with James, though, that it appears pretty clear that there's a strong linkage today.

 
Understanding tax cuts

I received this little tale in an email. It ostensibly originated with Dr. David R. Kamerschen, Distinguished Professor of Economics at the University of Georgia.

TAX CUTS - SIMPLE LESSON IN ECONOMICS

Politicians exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!", and it is accepted as fact. But what does that really mean? In case you are not completely clear on this issue, we hope the following will help:

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way Americans pay their taxes, it would go something like this:

  • The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
  • The fifth would pay $1.
  • The sixth would pay $3.
  • The seventh $7.
  • The eighth $12.
  • The ninth $18.
  • The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the restaurant owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."

Okay...so, now dinner for the ten cost only $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 reduction "windfall" so that everyone would get his "fair share'?

The six men realized that $20 divided by 6 is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being PAID to eat their meal!

So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

  • The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
  • The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
  • The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
  • The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
  • The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
  • The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

  • I only got $1 out of the $20," declared the sixth man. Then, pointing to the tenth man, he whined "but he got $10!"
  • "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"
  • "That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only $2? The rich get all the breaks!"
  • "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

They were so angry at the "injustice" that the nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him.

But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important:

They didn't have enough money between all of them to pay even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. If "fairness" rules, the people who pay the highest taxes should get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them unfairly, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. There are lots of good restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean.


 
Fair and balanced

Reading Kevin Drum reminds me that, to be fair, I need to mention some of the things where I believe the Bush administration is going wrong, not just where I think they're right. As a classified document, the August 6, 2001 PDB which was just declassified yesterday, is no less damaging today than it was two years ago. I have a hard time thinking of any reason for the difference than political advantage, or maybe being backed into a political corner. Another beef I've got with the Bush administration is their inability to admit they've ever made a mistake. This point is softened quite a bit by political realities. Admission of any error in our current political climate is like dousing yourself in gasoline and handing your enemy a match. As virulent as the anti-Bush attacks are as it is, it's unimaginable how extreme they would become if anyone in the administration admitted to making a mistake.

 
It's the media's fault

I've heard this on several occasions recently. In discussing the fact that the 9/11 attacks were a surprise, some self-important pundit lists the guilty parties: the Bush administration didn't know, the Clinton administration didn't know, the CIA didn't know, the FBI didn't know, the media didn't know...say what? Since when was the media an intelligence agency? I know, I know, sometimes the best source of information is the news media. But in the sense of collecting intelligence information on the plans and actions of terrorists, since when has the media done anything besides report the announcements made by governments, or report on attacks made by the terrorists. This pious acceptance of responsibility for not telling people about the dangers presented by Al Qaeda prior to 9/11 by various ego-inflated chuckleheads just shows how clueless so many of these people are. I'll update with a direct quote from Lisa Myers on MTP today as soon as they post the transcript.


Saturday, April 10, 2004
 
"Imminent"

Okay, let's get it straight: The Bush administration not only didn't claim that an Iraqi WMD attack was imminent, they specifically and repeatedly said that such an attack was not imminent, and that we cannot afford to wait until it is imminent. Those of you in politics and the media who continue to claim that we were told that such an attack was imminent are either incompetent and should be summarily fired, or you are liars, with a similar result necessary. Got that? You're either stupid, or you're a liar. And in 99.999% of the cases, my money's on the latter. Update: Eric at Classical Values debunks imminence from a different perspective, too.

 
Busy updating

I've been busy today updating my other site with family photos. As anyone who has done this knows, there's some work that has to be put into each photo before posting it. Aside from any cropping and red-eye correction, it has to be reduced to a reasonable size so it doesn't hang out the sides of your browser, then compressed appropriately so they're not too big byte-wise for folks using dial-up connections (most members of my family). If you're interested in what the Garrett family looks like, go have a peek.

 
What if?

Gregg Easterbrook presents an interesting piece on what might have happened if the Bush Administration had acted on the information they had in the summer of 2001. An excerpt:
On August 7, 2001, Bush had ordered the United States military to stage an all-out attack on alleged terrorist camps in Afghanistan. Thousands of U.S. special forces units parachuted into this neutral country, while air strikes targeted the Afghan government and its supporting military. Pentagon units seized abandoned Soviet air bases throughout Afghanistan, while establishing support bases in nearby nations such as Uzbekistan. Simultaneously, FBI agents throughout the United States staged raids in which dozens of men accused of terrorism were taken prisoner.
Please read the whole thing. I believe Gregg's version of history makes at least as much sense as anything touted by the Anybody But Bush crowd. Stolen from Noticed at small dead animals.


Friday, April 09, 2004
 
The Navy takes a new tack

I was thumbing through my print copy of Computerworld, and I read an article (apparently not available on line) that referenced this brief photo essay on a new vessel in the Navy's fleet: the USS Swift (HSV-2).

USS Swift (HSV-2)

From StrategyPage:

February 19, 2004: After five months of testing the USS Swift (HSV 2), the navy is eager to get more ships of this type. The Swift is a twin hulled catamaran, designed and built in Australia and is the second ship of the type used by the navy. The Swift was built in ten months. The HSV (High Speed Vessel) is actually a small ship, 320 feet long and displaces 1900 tons. It can carry up to 800 tons of cargo and has airline style seating for 300 troops, although up to 600 can be carried. The cargo can include vehicles of up to 70 tons each, including M-1 tanks. Vehicles are driven on and off. There is a trade off between tonnage carried, and speed and range. The twin hull design is also slowed down quite a bit in rough seas. The HSV would have a rough time of it in the violent seas common in the north Atlantic or Pacific. But in coastal waters, it is an excellent high speed transport.

As you can see in the photo, the Swift has a helo pad aft, and it can carry two UH-60 or CH-46 helos.

Manning the ship is something completely new. It can get away with a crew as small as 20, but the Swift has a total of 40 officers and sailors with accommodations for up to 51. The galley can feed up to 150, but I'm not sure how that matches up with the "seating for 300, although up to 600 can be carried" statement. The troops apparently won't be aboard that long. Or maybe they'll bring their MREs with them.


 
The multiplying cost of capitulation

Hello? Spain? You know I love you...te quiero...but this (I believe free registration is required) is what your capitulation to the terrorists has caused encouraged. (I don't want to give the impression that anyone other than those committing the crimes are responsible)
Iraqi militants have seized Korean, Japanese and Arab-Israeli civilians in the past two days, introducing an ominous new tactic designed to test the will of U.S. coalition partners who never expected to have to fight.
It's like that bully dog down the street: you can never show your fear. These Islamic terrorists want to obliterate Western civilization. They have decided it's "kill or be killed," and there's nothing we can do to change that. All we can do is oblige their death wish.

 
Life is good

From Scott Nolte, we learn that the Misery Index is much better than the Democrats and their stooges, the mainstream press, would have you believe.


Thursday, April 08, 2004
 
On being a Marine father

I just had a long telephone conversation with my ex-wife this evening. Our son is a Marine, and faces the possibility of deploying to Iraq later this year. We're proud of our son, and proud that he has chosen the noble profession of serving his country in the profession of arms. While we obviously hope that we predecease him, if he were to be so unfortunate as to lose his life in the service to his country, we agreed that our pride in our son would only be enhanced. Some things are more important than one's self. To quote Michael Kelly, "There are things worth dying for, and killing for." And sacrificing yourself, or your son, for. If you agree, you get it. If you don't, you don't.

 
Condi's riposte of the day

With everyone blogging about Dr. Rice's testimony before the 9/11 commission today, I'm kinda surprised that no one has mentioned this besides Meryl:
We know that the building of democracy is tough. It doesn't come easily. We have our own history. When our Founding Fathers said, "We the people," they didn't mean me.
As Meryl said, "You go, Condi."

 
[Loudoun County] We're Number 1!

The Census Bureau announced that Loudoun County is the fastest growing county in the United States.
To Loudoun County Board of Supervisors (Vice) Chairman Bruce Tulloch, who leads the developer-friendly faction of the board now in control, the rapid growth "is not a good thing or a bad thing. It's a challenging thing."
The Chairman disagrees.
The board chairman, Scott York, a holdover from the slow-growth board, sees it differently. He called the new board's policies the "Leave No Developer Left Behind Plan" and said county voters are not getting what they bargained for.
By the way, Scott is wrong.
The previous board swept into office four years ago and changed the zoning to take nearly 100,000 housing units out of the county building pipeline. When they did so, according to Tulloch, "they also stuck their head in the sand and would not talk to the development community." The result, Tulloch said, was that developers built anyway, to the maximum extent they were permitted under the zoning regulations. And the developers contributed nothing toward payment for roads or construction of playgrounds, parks and trails. ... While other fast-growing counties in Virginia continue to more often elect leaders hostile to developers, Tulloch said that in Loudoun County "people saw what was happening. Developments were still popping up, but the developers weren't putting up curbs; they weren't putting up tot lots; they weren't building trails," Tulloch said. "What do you get? Nothing."
They've got a tough job in front of them on this Board of Supervisors, and here's hoping they manage to pull our fat out of the fire, or at least get us started in the right direction. DISCLAIMER: Bruce Tulloch is a good friend of mine. I don't agree with him because he's my friend; we're friends because, among other things, we agree on this issue.

 
Dump the 5th Amendment?

Kevin Drum supports the trend toward videotaping interrogation of suspects, and offers an interesting proposal to do away with the right to not incriminate one's self:
I'd like to see videotaping required for all police interviews, and in return I'd suggest that the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination be discarded. If police interviews are all recorded and trials are all held in public, it's not at all clear to me what value the 5th Amendment right to silence has anymore.
I agree with Kevin that this is unlikely to ever happen, but I'm not sure that I would support elimination of the 5th Amendment, even if it were feasible. I don't often agree with Kevin, but we both certainly believe that videotaping interrogations is a positive development. My fear is that some activist judge or appeals court could rule that this violates the suspect's right to remain silent, unless they know they're being videotaped. That would be asinine, which is why I'm certain it won't be long before that happens.


Wednesday, April 07, 2004
 
Local tragedy

A young acquaintance of mine survived a devastating fire earlier today. Also covered here. Jake's father discovered the fire, and shouted out that there was a fire, and all twelve (12!) family members executed the fire emergency plan that they had practiced several times, and all escaped without injury. Jake, who is 18 and I believe is the eldest of the children, was trapped on an upper floor, and used an emergency escape ladder to climb down to the ground. The house essentially burned to the ground. I'm not sure how relevant this is, but Jake and all his siblings are home schooled. I know Jake because he and his younger brother, Dominic, were licensed last year as Amateur Radio operators, and we all belong to the same Amateur Radio club. My wife said that the club should raise some money to help out the family. My response? "Well, duh!"

 
I've been away for a couple of days...

I took the wife and kids to Ocean City for a couple of days during Spring Break. The weather was nothing short of fantastic, considering it's early April. But now, I'm off to a meeting, so hopefully I'll have more later this evening.


Sunday, April 04, 2004
 
Grammar test

When I read Michele's post at A Small Victory, I couldn't resist taking the grammar test myself: Grammar God!
You are a GRAMMAR GOD!

If your mission in life is not already to
preserve the English tongue, it should be.
Congratulations and thank you!

How grammatically sound are you?
brought to you by Quizilla Unlike Michele, I not only didn't major in English, I actually failed a few six-week terms in high school, and dropped Senior English the day I turned 18. Not because of grammar or anything like that, but because I hated writing. I hated writing. You're reading this in my blog. How ironic. Update: As James Joyner points out,
  • The quiz was fairly easy;
  • Only people who are reasonably proficient at grammar would take such a quiz; or
  • Only people who excel at these quizzes post them on their weblogs.
Or any combination of the above.

 
What's a Jew?

As noted on a wide variety of blogs, it has been discovered recently that an anti-semitic web site comes up first when you Google the term "jew." So, in recognition of the inappropriateness of this, everyone with a blog and/or a web site is encouraged to link to the following definition of Jew to help right this wrong.


Saturday, April 03, 2004
 
Injuries, suicide and the Vietnam Veteran's Memorial

I'm not sure how I feel about this:
The Defense Department has approved adding Air Force Capt. Edward Alan Brudno's name to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, ruling that his 1973 suicide was a direct result of wounds suffered as a prisoner of war.
But my potential objections don't match up with Scruggs':
The Air Force's recommendation to add the name to the memorial sparked debate last month after the president of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Jan C. Scruggs, contended that the addition could lead to thousands of other suicide victims' names being engraved on the wall.
While I don't believe that the result of Captain Brudno's name will result in a huge influx of suicides to be listed on the wall, it would be wrong if they did. I have a hard time agreeing that any suicide meets the criteria for inclusion:
...the longstanding guidelines for inclusion on the wall, which limit eligibility to military service members who were killed in Vietnam or who suffered injuries there that later proved fatal.
My interpretation of those guidelines is that the death must be directly caused by the servicemember's injuries. So, what were Captain Brudno's injuries?
Brudno's wounds were related to severe physical abuse, psychological abuse and torture in several prisoner of war camps in North Vietnam, according to a spokesman for Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld.
While I have the deepest sympathy and sincerest gratitude for our Vietnam veterans, especially those who were prisoners of war, this interpretation seems to me to be too far a stretch. I honor Captain Brudno's memory, and appreciate his service and regret the time he spent in a North Vietnamese prisoner-of-war camp, but I honestly don't believe his name belongs on the Wall. That notwithstanding, when I visit the Wall this summer, I will seek out his name and pay my respects.

 
I'll jump on the (anti-)Kos bandwagon

Lots of conservative bloggers have reacted in varying degrees to the now-infamous Kos posting, where he expressed contempt for the four contractors (Kos inaccurately and prejudicially calls them mercenaries) who were killed in Fallujah earlier this week, their corpses dragged through the streets and hung for a time from a bridge. I've never really been a Kos reader, so I had no prior opinion on the man, no particular respect or disrespect for him. Like most others, I thought Kos's post was itself contemptible. I think Michele was the angriest among my regular blog visits, and the reactions I read elsewhere all line up as expected. The most satisfying, though, was Kevin Drum's call for Kos to "step up to the plate and apologize." It's always the most effective when it's someone from the same team who calls someone on their misbehavior, and Kevin zeroed in on the key point: just apologize, Kos, and be sincere about it.


Friday, April 02, 2004
 
Search phrases that make no sense

Here are some of the search phrases that led folks to my site recently. Presented without comment. tornado hunt sounds grunches moore,oklahoma mobile home blog models sex Now, if I can just find the sexy blog models 'round here. Oops, I wasn't supposed to comment.

 
The soldiers "get it"

Earlier this week, Donald Sensing elaborated on my earlier post on the nature of military service. Today, James Joyner comments on a Washington Times report that:
Army divisions that fought the past 12 months in Iraq have met virtually every re-enlistment goal, a sign that the all-volunteer force remains strong under the stress of frequent deployments and hazardous duty. ... "This tends to rebut armchair critics who said the sky is falling and the vultures are circling and the Army is gong to lose all its troops," said Lt. Col. Franklin Childress, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon. "This is not true. The soldiers get it."
Yes, they get it. Nothing teaches that lesson better than being in fear for your life while serving your country, and even the world. You know you're doing something that few others are willing to do, and great benefit will come from the efforts of you and your comrades-in-arms. As James concludes:
...contrary to the idea that most of these folks are in it for free college and other benefits, most soldiers not only know what they're signing up for but they actually want to do it.
Quite so. Serving a cause greater than one's self is a very fulfilling career.

 
[Loudoun County] Building a budget is a messy business

Leesburg Today:
Apr 02, 2004 -- Loudoun taxpayers may see a tax rate of $1.1075 for FY 2005 after the board of supervisors wrapped up straw votes last night that gave the schools an additional $3 million and county employees a 4 percent raise.
This is a quarter-cent drop from the current tax rate, but property taxes will still go up, based on higher assessments, averaging 12% around the county. It's also interesting to note that the six vote bloc from the Eastern part of the county, much touted or much decried, depending on the viewer's perspective, is not the monolithic being that many have believed it to be over the past three months. While the votes still tend to be 6-3, sometimes the makeup of each side of that vote shifts around, usually splitting off Eugene Delgaudio (R-Sterling), Mick Staton (R-Sugarland Run) and Lori Waters (R-Broad Run), and replacing them with the usual three-vote minority of Chairman Scott York (I-At Large), Jim Burton (I-Blue Ridge) and Sally Kurtz (D-Catoctin). There were some unsurprising squabbles involving the usual squabblers, but while this looks like a messy process, it's good to see the give-and-take, compromising and discussions. While some have occasionally sunk to the usual ad hominem (granted, usually provoked by ad hominem attacks from special interest groups) of extremists that we frequently see on the national scene, these folks have generally tried to stay on the high road and focus on the job at hand. I wish all nine of them the best, because they collectively have a job that's very difficult to do well.

 
Democrats propose establishment of Director of National Intelligence

From The Washington Post:
The Democratic members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence yesterday recommended the establishment of a director of national intelligence who would have both budgetary and operational control over the CIA and the much larger collection of Pentagon and other agencies that collect and analyze intelligence. In offering what would be a major reorganization, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) said: "One of the major deficiencies in our intelligence community is the fact that there are 15 intelligence agencies -- operating with different rules, cultures and databases -- that do not work as one integrated intelligence community."
The idea has merit, and deserves some serious debate. As we learn more about the coordination and communication, or lack thereof, among the various federal intelligence agencies, it appears that the current arrangement needs more than just a few tweaks. On the other hand, as a former (small-fry) member of that intelligence community, I'm not sure that most of the differences among agencies aren't actually for the best. Rather than just having a single approach, a single "culture" for the collection of intelligence, I think that a certain degree of redundancy, coming from different perspectives, gives the U.S. intelligence community a better shot at getting the information that we need. And specifically, within the Department of Defense, the primary purpose for intelligence efforts is to support military operations. In that vein, it's absolutely necessary that commanders have direct operational control over intelligence collection within their commands. I would think that similar positions could be justified for many of the various intelligence agencies. It seems to me that improved communication and improved access to information collected by other agencies, is the primary need here. I don't know that much about other intelligence agencies, but it would be a huge mistake to remove complete and direct control of military intelligence from the military services.


Thursday, April 01, 2004
 
Reporting or reviewing?

The front page of The Washington Post today carries an article on Air America Radio's debut yesterday with Al Franken's "The O'Franken Factor." The article, written by Howard Kurtz, the Post's media reviewer, reflects an ongoing problem with newspapers today: they don't do nearly as much reporting as they used to. While it certainly conveyed information about the show and the fledgling liberal radio network, it was actually a review. One of the most egregious examples:
A good radio show has strong pacing and a deft mixture of ideology, confrontation and humor. Franken's "Factor" was meandering and discursive, almost NPR-like, sounding more like someone shooting the breeze at a dinner party than trying to persuade listeners. The "bumpers" between segments were soft and Muzak-like. With Franken speaking in a relatively low voice, the self-proclaimed "Zero Spin Zone" sometimes sounded like a zero energy zone.
This is a news story? That belongs on the front page of one of the largest, most influential newspapers in the country? I've got no problems with the article itself, but what bothers me is that the Post is implicitly presenting this as factual, rather than as Kurtz's opinion. This "subliminal" editorializing can be found in virtually every article in the Post. It's rare for a story to just present the facts. Who knows, maybe this just reflects the problems with retaining and increasing readership, that "just the facts" doesn't interest anyone anymore. I have my doubts about that, and I'm disappointed in the trend.